U.S. 2008 Elections

[FireStorm]

Look what spineless democrats got us 9-11. The wolrd trader center was bombed the first time by a truck what did clinton do?Nothing... the uss cole attack what did clinton do jack shit. How about the embassy's around the world that were being attacked? Whatdid he do? Jack Squat. Did his promise of a universal health care come true no, actually did any of his promises come true? Meph do more reading cause we were in a recession from 93- 97 during his term, Your talk of building a trillion dollers is talking right out the bung hole. It is not fact it is your exaggeration. History has proved anytime a democrat got in offIce they fucked it all up. Just look at carter prime example of a spinelss coward.
I LOVE AND SUPPORT BUSH. MCAIN FOR PRESIDENT BOOOYAHHHH

[wildchild]

All i have to say is Bush may not be the smartest guy.....certainly, but hes done what NEEDS to be done, and what needs to be done is not always what people WANT to be done.

I just took a test in US Gov class with 100 questions on it multiple choice and the results of how we answered would tell us if we were a rep. or dem. I got 50% 50% so i am in no way swung to one side based of nothing but a party's title.

I really dont know who yet, I'm worried Mccain might croak over halfway though his term..lol

[FireStorm]

Originally Posted by wildchild

All i have to say is Bush may not be the smartest guy.....certainly, but hes done what NEEDS to be done, and what needs to be done is not always what people WANT to be done.

I just took a test in US Gov class with 100 questions on it multiple choice and the results of how we answered would tell us if we were a rep. or dem. I got 50% 50% so i am in no way swung to one side based of nothing but a party's title.

I really dont know who yet, I'm worried Mccain might croak over halfway though his term..lol

Someone that speaks some sense. If you are 50 -50 then consider yourself an independant. I'll trust a republican to protect our shores any before a spineless democrat. Down with obama bin laden aka barrack hussein

[Mephisto]

Correction , he reduxed the budget by almost $500 billion. Republicans jacked the deficit up to $5.7 trillion, and everytime the debt starts to get paid off another republican gets in office and runs up the tab more. Anyways I am bowing out o f this pointless debate, peopel get so brainwashed by the media . Not understanding that media outlets have perty loyalties as well. Its like hearing a news story on CNN and then hearing a different version on Al Jazeera, or English TV. You always get a different side.

[LUCKY007]

Originally Posted by FireStorm

I'll trust a republican to protect our shores any before a spineless democrat. Down with obama bin laden aka barrack hussein

so wat was reagan, hey that was a great prez, yet republicans are just about money and luxury, wat was abraham, washington, and the other great dem. prez of our old times, yet some won big wars, and made a country great, its just now, not 1 prez, rep, or demo, knows wats best for the U.S. anymore, thats why hopefully borack will bring change, but as you all kno here in the united states, recently these president wanna bees, just talk, abd wen in office dont put on the talble wat they preached

Like clinton wen he was prez, he sucked, and yet had a feamle giving him head and sex in the oval office, NOW wat would hilary do if prez, get back at him, and have a guy do it to her to get even....Lmao

[LUCKY007]

Has any1 even stood to see the Debate between Borrack Obama and John Mcain?
I tell you this as much as we need a new 4 year term president, its ok that they both have their i want to be president issues....But cmon, not 1 of them actually answered 1 question correct that was asked by Jim..

John Mcain"s arguments were hard to follow at the beginning, but soon found his voice as the debate progressed, although he never seemed fully in control of his message. He had plenty to say about the economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Russia, but often bogged down his own answers when trying to unfurl quips and soundbites. Jokes about being deaf and anecdotes about Normandy and George Shultz seemed ill-advised.....He managed to ignore most of Obama's jibes, but was eventually baited into giving an extended answer about his policy differences with President Bush, after his opponent repeatedly mentioned McCain's regular support of Bush's budgets

So as far as for Barrack Obama Quite manifestly immersed in the past, present, and future details of policy, and eager to express his views,he did avoid the nitty-gritty details of policy positions in favor of broad principles and references to working Americans, thereby not presenting the kind of specifics that even i myself was waiting to hear from him....Yah i give it to him he was Fully prepared, and had a real depth of knowledge on nearly every issue. he had a reasonable answer for every charge that came his way,Went for a solid, consistent performance to introduce himself to a country that wants a good president.

But they both didnt provide the hard answer i think we all in the USA wanted to hear, But who knows i have a feeling Barrack Obama will win this 1.

[Lizi]

I'm an aussie so i cant vote, but i hope Obama wins, I don't like Mcain his age is worrying, but i also don't like war.

Thats all ill say ^^.

[Mephisto]

Originally Posted by LUCKY007

Has any1 even stood to see the Debate between Borrack Obama and John Mcain?
I tell you this as much as we need a new 4 year term president, its ok that they both have their i want to be president issues....But cmon, not 1 of them actually answered 1 question correct that was asked by Jim..

John Mcain"s arguments were hard to follow at the beginning, but soon found his voice as the debate progressed, although he never seemed fully in control of his message. He had plenty to say about the economy, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Russia, but often bogged down his own answers when trying to unfurl quips and soundbites. Jokes about being deaf and anecdotes about Normandy and George Shultz seemed ill-advised.....He managed to ignore most of Obama's jibes, but was eventually baited into giving an extended answer about his policy differences with President Bush, after his opponent repeatedly mentioned McCain's regular support of Bush's budgets

So as far as for Barrack Obama Quite manifestly immersed in the past, present, and future details of policy, and eager to express his views,he did avoid the nitty-gritty details of policy positions in favor of broad principles and references to working Americans, thereby not presenting the kind of specifics that even i myself was waiting to hear from him....Yah i give it to him he was Fully prepared, and had a real depth of knowledge on nearly every issue. he had a reasonable answer for every charge that came his way,Went for a solid, consistent performance to introduce himself to a country that wants a good president.

But they both didnt provide the hard answer i think we all in the USA wanted to hear, But who knows i have a feeling Barrack Obama will win this 1.

I apologize for going off topic but Lucky did you just cut and paste that from a news article. it lacks um, how do I say, your usual english diction :p

[LUCKY007]

naw , with all wats really going on in the great USA u have to stay soooo freaking focused on the election that might change alot of the way we see things.

I give it to Obama, why cause 1 thing, he proved that any1 , if stives hard can accomplish alot in life. and not let that wall of conquer let it bring them down , without trying. Here is a man from 1 of the poorest country in the world, walking barefoot to school, Heck not even have a decent meal.
And yet came from the very bottom of things, and LOOK where he stands now. Alot of ppl criticized him, why cause he was only in senate for 2 years. Since when has that chhanged anytime.
! he deserves more credit then anything.: Reson, 2 years in the senate and yet he has beaten and got to where he is now Going for President , Where other parties have tried and been in the seante, governor, house of reps. for some 10+years

Who knows, he has studied alot, and actually made a name for himself. Maybe even if yes he has only 2 years, but learned a great deal in those 2 years, Just maybe he might change some things in the USA that needs changing, Especially now that congress rejected the 700 billion bailout .

But seeing that debate, i wasnt too happy at both candidates. If it would have been like 2004 where internet users asked questions. I think it would be the same, none of the 2 would give a straight forward answer.
Just sadened that in the debate non wer really focused as to wat they would really do as president, change, move, or go about

[Roonie222]

If I could vote I would vote Nader